Skip to main content

Mexico

Oversight and accountability in Mexico

A national human-rights commission (and one per state) with non-binding recommendations, and — since 2024 — a Judicial Discipline Tribunal in place of the former judicial council.

Fact-checkedLast updated Last reviewed

Facts on this page were checked against their sources on .

National Human Rights Commission (CNDH)
The federal human-rights body (Article 102-B), to which anyone may complain of administrative acts or omissions by the authorities (except the federal judiciary); its recommendations are public but non-binding. Each state also has its own human-rights commission.
Judicial Discipline Tribunal and judicial-administration body
Since the 2024 reform, the discipline of the federal judiciary is exercised by a Judicial Discipline Tribunal and its administration by a separate judicial-administration body (Article 94), replacing the former Council of the Federal Judiciary; the states must create equivalents (Article 116-III).
Police complaints
There is no single dedicated national police-complaints authority; complaints against the police run through the Public Prosecutor, internal-affairs units, and the national and state human-rights commissions.
  • Why do justice systems need oversight?

    Justice institutions hold coercive powers, often operate out of public view, and make decisions that are hard to reverse. This guide explains the oversight mechanisms built to detect and correct errors, and their limits.

  • What is justice?

    Justice is the principle that people should be treated according to rules that apply equally to everyone, decided by bodies that are authorised, constrained, and answerable. This guide explains what that means institutionally.

Sources

Sources

  1. Political Constitution of the United Mexican States (1917, current text)

    Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación / official constitutional text · Legislation · 1917-02-05 · link verified 2026-07-27

    The Political Constitution of the United Mexican States (1917), confirmed against the Supreme Court's per-article texts and a current-text mirror in two independent passes (the consolidated official PDF at diputados.gob.mx was unreachable). Supports Art. 17 (federal and local laws shall guarantee the independence of the courts); Art. 40 (a representative, democratic, secular and federal Republic of free and sovereign States and Mexico City); Art. 124 (residual powers reserved to the States or Mexico City); Art. 73-XXI (Congress legislates federal crimes and organized crime, and enacts a single national code of criminal procedure, sentence execution and juvenile justice governing both the federal and the common order); Art. 94 (the Supreme Court of nine Ministers, plus a judicial-administration body and a Judicial Discipline Tribunal); Art. 102-A (the Public Prosecution of the Federation is organised as an autonomous public body, the Fiscalía General de la República); Art. 21 (public security is a shared function of the Federation, the states and the municipalities; the investigation of crimes corresponds to the Public Prosecutor with the police under its conduct and command); Art. 18 (the penitentiary system, organised for social reinsertion); Art. 96 and Art. 116-III (judges elected by direct citizen vote — see the 2024 reform); and Art. 102-B (the human-rights commissions and their non-binding recommendations).